Summary and Critical Reflection of a Talk Essay

Summary and Critical Reflection of a Talk - try out ExampleThis makes the people supporting convicted poses right to live with their children in prison raise questions about equivalence rights and if the government and law really c ars about the intrinsic rights of guilty women at all. The desire to keep a child close to look after him/her is a natural right of a parent disregardless of his/her criminal background. This approach forms the bedrock of the female lawyer in the audio link who interestingly contemplates the daring of rights of imprisoned women to keep their children close. She establishes herself as an enthusiastic supporter of imprisoned womens rights believing many of them are really confronted with unfortunate challenges. The lawyer who is also a shrewd womens rights activist calmly asks that in absence of a good rehabilitation program, where is an unfortunate child supposed to go? The presence of a father or a guardian is one option, precisely what happens to a large population of children who in the absence of a thoughtful child protection group have nowhere to go when not allowed by the present to stay with their unfortunate pay backs? It is stressed by her that in many instances, a pose despite her felonious record is fit to handle the chores of a regular stick but she is static denied the right to hold custody of her child. This rejection is only made emphatic by the fact that she is incarcerated, has committed whatsoever crime in the past, violated the law, and lost all reputation. However, it should be pondered here by opponents of children inside prison ideology as suggested by the lawyer that does any of these factors really make the desire of an imprisoned cleaning lady to live with her children any less overwhelming? Does the ministrys decision to take children away from their guilty mother to help them grow up in a nontoxic atmosphere also snatch this testament of the mother to see her children on routine basis? Such co ncerns are open to multiple interpretations as claimed by the lawyer and implementing decision based on analysis of only one side of the regard is not a smart talent strategy. When there is not enough evidence suggesting a mother is physically, mentally, or behaviorally capable of looking after her child, creating barriers between mother and child is empty mockery of natural military personnel rights. It is claimed by the highly concerned lawyer speaking for all incarcerated mothers that the importance of creating more mother and baby units in jails where cannot be stressed enough. It should be safely assumed by governments everywhere that the beat out place of all for a child to stay is with his/her parent provided the parent is not disadvantaged mentally. The have it away of imprisoned womens rights picked up momentum and made headlines in Vancouver, Canada when the provincial program got cancelled in 2008 which allowed babies to stay with their mothers. It is claimed in one re port that this negative step taken by the law enforcement agencies and state not only negatively interfered with the infants right to a mothers care, but also raised valid questions about discrimination against female prisoners and inequality of rights. It is compellingly stated by turncock Hough that the lives of far more people in todays world are imperiled by human rights abuses than by terrorist or conventional military attacks (cited in Darian-Smith, 2013, p. 257). The report further reveals the